• Ukraine Ukraine
  • Germany Germany
  • Austria Austria
  • Slovakia Slovakia
  • Hungary Hungary
  • Croatia Croatia
  • Serbia Serbia
  • Bulgaria Bulgaria
  • Romania Romania
  • Moldova Moldova
All News News

Ukraine and Moldova Align Their Estimates of Agricultural Transit Potential: Up to 800,000 Tonnes per Month

The assessments of the Ukrainian and Moldovan authorities regarding the potential volume of rail transit of Ukrainian agricultural products through Moldova are effectively converging. At the initial stage of the 2026/27 marketing year, Ukraine expects transit volumes of up to 500,000 tonnes of agricultural products per month, while the Moldovan side had previously estimated the realistic potential of such transit at approximately 600,000 tonnes per month.

According to Ukraine’s Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, Taras Vysotskyi, if demand increases and the relevant infrastructure is prepared, the corridor’s capacity could subsequently be expanded to 800,000 tonnes per month. At the same time, he noted that certain infrastructure and operational limitations remain on the Moldovan side, meaning that the immediate priority is to ensure effective use of the capacity already available.

Chișinău’s position broadly corresponds with the Ukrainian assessment. Moldova’s Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development estimates the potential volume of Ukrainian transit at approximately 600,000 tonnes, stressing that actual transportation volumes will depend on railway infrastructure capacity, rolling stock availability, train schedules and the needs of Moldovan exporters.

The Moldovan side has also clarified that the previously mentioned figure of 4.5 million tonnes refers to the calculated annual capacity of the railway corridor between Ukraine and Moldova rather than an agreed volume of Ukrainian transit for the near term. At the same time, a 50% reduction in the relevant tariff for Ukrainian transit rail freight is expected to remain in force until the end of 2026.

Moldovan authorities have additionally stressed that the development of Ukrainian transit must not create obstacles for the country’s own exports. Should delays emerge or excessive pressure be placed on the national railway system, the transit mechanism may be adjusted in order to protect the interests of Moldovan farmers and exporters.

Comment by the Institute of Danube Research

The Institute of Danube Research notes that the convergence of Ukrainian and Moldovan estimates is an important indication that the discussion on the “Solidarity Corridors” is moving from the level of political agreements towards the formation of a realistic operational transit model.

A range of 500,000–600,000 tonnes per month may be regarded as a basic working scenario, while the figure of 800,000 tonnes represents potential reserve capacity. Reaching this level would require coordinated operation of Ukrainian and Moldovan railways, border crossings, transshipment facilities and port infrastructure.

It is particularly important to distinguish between the theoretical capacity of a transport corridor and its actual commercial throughput. Infrastructure availability alone does not guarantee corresponding freight volumes. Wagon turnaround times, traffic management, the speed of border and customs procedures, locomotive availability and the coordination of transit with Moldova’s domestic freight flows will remain decisive factors.

In the Institute’s assessment, gradually increasing the corridor’s utilisation to 500,000–600,000 tonnes per month represents a more economically and logistically sustainable approach than attempting immediately to reach maximum theoretical capacity. Such a model would make it possible to identify real bottlenecks in the system and prevent Ukrainian transit from competing with Moldovan exporters for limited railway capacity.

At the same time, a stable Moldovan route is becoming increasingly important for Ukraine not merely as a temporary alternative. Provided that predictable tariff policies are maintained and coordination with Moldova and Romania is strengthened, the corridor could gradually become a permanent component of the regional transport architecture, linking the Ukrainian railway system with Moldovan transport hubs, Lower Danube ports and the Romanian logistics network.

Therefore, the key indicator of the effectiveness of the Ukrainian-Moldovan transit corridor will not be its formal maximum capacity, but its ability to ensure a stable, predictable and economically competitive freight flow without undermining Moldova’s own export capacity.